|
Teacher commentary and reflection:
|
 |
| Student project from
2002, a visual essay based on their reading of Laura
Esquvel's Like Water for Chocolate. Click
on the picture for larger view. |
 |
The overall lesson on Like Water for Chocolate was
a success. The students loved reading the book; I even
had students who had not completed previous assigned books
read this book in three days. Students were eager and excited
to participate in classroom activities and completed assignments
on time. Throughout this lesson, there were obstacles that
got in the way but did not prevent the success of the unit
as a whole.
My driving activity for this unit was to have students
write narrative essays about their family traditions and
write a how-to essay providing instruction on how to prepare
a favorite family meal. My purpose for this assignment
was to prepare students for the unique writing style of
Laura Esquivel and introduce them to the theme of family
traditions. When I discussed this assignment with the class,
I received many puzzled looks. The students explained that
they did not have a family tradition. I was surprised at
their remarks, and I realized that they did not know how
to define family tradition and make connection to their
own family life. I had taken for granted that they
would know.
To eliminate this obstacle, I prepared a one week lesson
on family traditions and rituals and incorporated it as
part of the unit. Students viewed the television modified
version of the film Soul
Food whose plot includes the themes of family
and family traditions. As a result of teaching about family
traditions and rituals, the unit was extended an additional
two weeks. The first week included class discussions and
worksheets and in the second week students worked on writing
and editing their narrative essays.
As a rule, I cover the historical setting of the books
I teach. In doing so, I always have students conduct a
preliminary research and write a summary before I lecture
on the historical setting. The purpose for this strategy
is that I find when students have invested time and energy
in a topic before I lecture, they bring prior knowledge
to the subject area and they derive more from the lecture.
Once students completed their research, summary writing,
and oral presentations, I lectured on the Mexican Revolution
(1910-1933) and they viewed the film Viva Zapata. During
the course of the unit, I had ten books on the Mexican Revolution
in the classroom for students to use.
As a reading strategy, students worked in small groups
using reciprocal teaching. This was not a new concept for
my students who had used reciprocal teaching with short
stories throughout the school year. My assessment of students
as I sat in on their group discussions was that their written
work and group conversations were more superficial than
analytical. My first reaction was to give each group guided
questions to consider along with the questions that the
group questioner prepared for the discussion.
After a couple of days, I decided against this approach
and allowed the students to continue what they were doing
before I intervened. The purpose of my decision was that
students were actively engaged in group discussion and they
were following the strategy of reciprocal teaching. However,
I prepared a guided reading worksheet that students completed
after the reciprocal teaching which gave them an opportunity
to reread the book. The students did not mind reading the
book again, and the guided questions were designed to prepare
students for the final project and a final response to the
essential questions.
I used audio tapes for students who have difficulty with
reading. These students listen to the tapes in class while
following along with the reading, and then they participated
in the class discussions. The class discussions followed
the small group discussions.
In teaching this lesson again, I would re-think the use
of reciprocal teaching. This was my first time using reciprocal
teaching with a book. The guided reading worksheets were
more successful in preparing students for the final project
than the reciprocal teaching; however, the reciprocal teaching
allowed students to take control of their own reading and
explore the book with one another.
|