| Presentation |
Slides are less comprehensible,
of poor quality, perhaps out of order, small in
number and/or minimally illustrate life in Harlem.
Sources are not documented. |
Slides are in a comprehensible,
perhaps chronological order, fulfill the 15 slide
requirement, illustrate life in Harlem fully with
several interest peaking “events.” |
Slides are seamlessly arranged
and anticipate what follows. The 15 slide minimum
is exceeded but this does not slow down the presentation.
Harlem is presented engagingly. |
| Resources |
A narrow variety of sources
is used, might not be documented, and/or are of
dubious authority or quality. |
A wide variety of sources
is used and documented. High quality, authoritative
images are used |
Shows a wide and deep search
for material which though representative is unusually
electric. |
| Narration |
The narrative is short,
inaudible, insincere, and/or unpracticed. |
The narration is clearly,
audibly and engagingly presented. It is practiced
with few glitches. |
The narration is slick,
in sync with the presentation, highly informational
and exciting. |
| Presentation |
The presenter(s) are less
prepared, prone to false starts and hiatus in material
and/or seem unpracticed. |
The presenter(s) are prepared,
in control of the material, practiced and engaging
|
The presenter(s) are highly
prepared and practice and show that they have anticipated
audience interest and reaction. |
| Presentation Technical |
The presenter(s) make little
attempt to use PowerPoint links, text, color, background
or other tools to distinguish his (their) presentation.
|
The presenter(s) effectively
use PowerPoint features to distinguish his (their)
presentation and might include special backgrounds,
color and textures, internal links and navigation
buttons. |
The presenter(s) superbly
use PowerPoint features to distinguish his (their)
presentation including animation, movies, clip art,
formatted text, modified photos and web links. |
