Lesson
3 – Lesson Plan
Web Quest on “How to Write a Mystery.”
Book: Rage in Harlem or other mystery/detective
fiction by Chester Himes.
Grade Level: 11/12
Essential Question: What are the elements of
a mystery from the writers point of view?
Connection to Standards: Writing: Short Story
Writing (9/10 2.1), Narrative Writing (11/12 2.1)
Technology: The computer is used as a research
and reading tool to find and study sites on the how-to
of mystery writing.
Lesson Plan Content:
1) Read a short mystery of your choosing to or with the
class. This should be a short story and should exemplify
the kind of story you want to see your students write.
Chester Himes wrote short story mysteries as well as novels;
Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes is also a good source.
2) Discuss the “elements” of the mystery
story with the class
a. The plot
b. The detective
c. The crime
d. The situation (Gloomy palace? Rock
climbing trip? Manhattan?)
e. The suspect pool
f. The clues including the red herrings
g. The “reveal” –
when the solution is revealed by the detective.
3) Also, a general discussion of motive, opportunity,
means and other quasi-legal features of crime fiction
should be held.
4). As a class, outline a mystery (Students often like
to “kill” their teacher and will willingly
participate in a mock-mystery.
5) The students will go on-line to read and study a site
such as http://www.gillianroberts.com/write/lesson1.htm
which is “How to Write a Mystery” in eleven
lessons. The students are to follow the Gillian Roberts
lessons and write vignettes you require as they move through
the lessons. You may, of course, use as many or as few
of the lessons as you feel are productive.
Assessment:
The objective here is to produce a fairly full outline
of a mystery story which defines in some detail the plot,
the character of the detective, the crime involved, the
suspect pool, the clues, the red herrings and the method
of revealing and solving the crime.
The students, then, will create an annotated outline
of their mystery story including some dialogue. The evaluation,
according to the following rubric can be done by other
students in read-around groups to share the good ideas
with other students.
| |
Weak |
Strong |
Excellent |
| Characters |
Characters are stock, weak
or unbelievable. |
Characters are engaging
particularly the detective. |
At least two characters
are unforgettable, engaging or fun. |
| Plot |
The plot, though present,
is unrealistic or hard to follow. Or it does not
“work.” |
The plot has twists but
remains possible, believable and compelling. |
The plot is ingenious,
employing ruses and surprises. |
| Ingenuity |
The story is mundane or
lacks compelling detail of action, situation or
character. |
The writer shows ingenuity
in crafting the plot, characters and situation.
Surprises are included. |
The writer has thought
about the problems of creation and clearly shows
some mastery. |
| Situation |
The situation is too brutal,
too usual or unrealistic. |
The situation is not only
possible but likely though it might be unusual.
|
The situation is plausible,
engaging, well researched and authentic. |
|